![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||
| I hate romantic comedies. I hate them because usually they are neither romantic nor particularly funny. I hate them because they perpetuate lies about relationships that people carry over into everyday life. I hate them because they offer facile, "love conquers all" answers to the messiness of real-life male/female interaction. I hate them because they are usually poorly written and star either Hugh Grant, Julia Roberts, or worse, both (see also: NOTTING HILL). I hate romantic comedies, unless, of course, they star John Cusack.
So what is it about this guy's screen persona that's so appealing to women? Part of it is that his characters are more like women than men. They wear their emotions on their sleeves, they're consumed with self-doubt, but still, they value love over almost everything else in their lives. They talk to their friends about relationships, something most men never do. Cusack is cute in a soulful, puppyish kind of way, and he's also bright, witty, and articulate, and just edgy enough to be interesting. But perhaps the key to Cusack's charm, and his success as a leading man, is that he doesn't play his characters' emotions to his female co-stars, he plays them to the women in the audience. However, Cusack has been playing Lloyd Dobler now for more than a decade, and perhaps the character is just starting to wear thin. Or perhaps he merely phoned in his performance in SERENDIPITY, focusing instead on his upcoming project HOFFMAN, in which he portrays the young Adolf Hitler's art teacher. We know Cusack's range isn't limited to Doblerisms, we've seen him play neurotic puppeteers (BEING JOHN MALKOVICH), sleazeballs (THE GRIFTERS), ruthless politicians (TRUE COLORS), and John Wayne-ish cowboys (THE JACK BULL). Perhaps he's bored with Being Lloyd Dobler. And who wouldn't be, in the mess that is SERENDIPITY? The ghost of Meg Ryan hovers around this picture, the self-conscious adorableness of which is so pervasive that I nearly needed an insulin shot about halfway through.
Meanwhile, Our Hero, who's forgotten his girlfriend when presented with Beckinsale's Bambi-like eyes, wants to exchange phone numbers, but Sarah is one of those insufferable women who believe in soulmates and fate, and yes, Serendipity. This ought to clue Jon that she's nuts, or at the very least, profoundly ambivalent, but in true Cusack Hero fashion, he finds this irresistable. Sara spends the five dollar bill on which he writes his phone number, writes her number in a copy of Love in the Time of Cholera, and says that if these items find their way back into their hands, they are fated to be together. Assuming that the Cusack Oeuvre is essentially different experiences of the same character, the title of the chosen book ought to have been a warning, because Marquez' book is one of the volumes cited by Cusack's Rob Gordon in High Fidelity. If Jon is sane, he decides he doesn't need this, but remember, this is Boombox Guy from Say Anything, and since Lloyd Dobler hasn't learned from his mistakes in twelve years, why should we expect him to start now?
Do you care? What I hate about stories like this is that they treat initial infatuation as true love. They make it seem perfectly acceptable to treat your Significant Other shabbily merely because someone else you find attractive comes along, conveying the message that you wouldn't feel the way you do if it weren't Fate. On the way to bringing two obviously unsuited people together and making us think they are Made For Each Other, deus ex machinae substitute for plot trajectory, the better to speed the proceedings along before we realize that the two characters in question are merely screwed-up people with cold feet who can't commit to anyone.
Cusack is usually, in this reviewer's opinion, He Who Can Do No Wrong, but here he seems to have phoned in his Lloyd Dobler bit. Only in one utterly lovely moment when he sees the constellation Casseopaeia in the freckles on Sara's arm (THAT'S why women find him irresistable, guys), do we see the trademark Cusack charm. Beckinsale, however, is an utterly charmless actress in the doe-eyed Winona Ryder mold. Her dark features are developing an interesting sophistication, but she's still playing sexually immature ingenues. Cusack is capable of conveying real longing, but the with the virginal Beckinsale, all the eyelash-batting in the world does not generate heat.
Peter Chelsom's direction gives New York a twinkly, magical quality that's almost poignant in the weeks post-September 11, especially with all the shots of the New York skyline edited to delete the Twin Towers, lest anything mar the adorableness of the proceedings. But the clunky script piles contrivance upon cliché until nothing can save it. Perhaps SERENDIPITY is what people want right now as we mourn the dead and fear for the future. If that's the case, I'm going to miss the Irony Years even more than I do already. -- Jill Cozzi |
||||||||||||||||||
Review text copyright © 2001 Jill Cozzi and Cozzi fan Tutti, © 2003 Mixed Reviews. All rights reserved. Reproduction of text in whole or in part in any form or in any medium without express written permission of Mixed Reviews or the author is prohibited. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Back To Top | Home | Archive | E-Mail Harvest |
||||||||||||||||||