|
Last year I wrote about the documentary
film S21:
The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine: "The
seeds of genocide are always the same -- first comes
the demonization of the other, then removal of the
other from the general population, then the dehumanization
of the prisoners AND the inculcation of those assigned
as guards to regard the prisoners as less than human,
and finally, extermination. Genocide takes place in
both the developed world and the developing world,
and it seems that this sort of scapegoating taken
to the nth degree may just be part of human nature.
Also part of human nature is the need to document
and record the history of each episode of genocide,
in what has so far proven to be a vain attempt to
prevent repetition of the past by remembering it."
In one of the cruelest actions ever committed
in Colonial history without any direct bloodshed,
Belgium performed a "Trading Places" maneuver
when its colony Rwanda became independent in 1962.
After regarding the historically nomadic, lighter-skinned
Tutsi minority as Rwandan aristocracy, they placed
the Hutu majority in charge up on their departure.
A fragile cease-fire that existed between the Hutu
government and insurgent Tutsi rebels was shattered
when Rwandan President Habyalimana was assassinated
on April 6, 1994, unleashing the violence against
Tutsi rebels that resulted in the extermination of
nearly 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu. And the world
did nothing.
As one
of the cacophony of bloggers on the left side
of the political spectrum, one of the things I find
most baffling and frustrating about the current political
scene is the willingness of those who support the
current President to regard every move he makes as
wonderful. They, of course, believe we did the same
when Bill Clinton was president, but nothing could
be further from the truth, particularly where the
Administration's frustrating inaction in Rwanda is
concerned. Still haunted by the image of an American
soldier being dragged through the streets of Somalia
in a conflict he inherited from his predecessor, Clinton
had neither the will nor the political capital to
intervene in the slaughter. Worse, the Clinton Administration
gave its blessing to the U.N. Security Council's decision
to reduce the number of peacekeeping force to such
a degree that those remained could do nothing but
watch the slaughter. Forget about the recklessness
in his personal life. The largest blot on the Clinton
record is his timidity in the face of genocide, and
believe me, we on the left were very well aware of
it.
One
man who could not stand by was Paul Rusesabagina,
a hotel manager at the Hotel Mille Collines in Kigali,
a moderate Hutu who provided safe harbor to over 1200
Tutsi and moderate Hutu at the hotel after the evacuation
of its largely European clientele. Rusesabagina has
been called "the Rwandan Oskar Schindler",
but such analogies are facile and inaccurate, for
Schindler's initial motivation was purely mercenary
-- hiring Jews to work in his factories made pure
business sense as a source of cheap labor. Humanitarianism
kicked in later on. Rusesabagina found himself providing
shelter and protection to his countrypeople simply
because it was the right thing to do.
As
portrayed by Don Cheadle, who will no longer be a
relative unknown after this role, Rusesabagina is
a man who enjoys the comforts that his position affords
him -- a comfortable, attractive home; access to fine
cigars and clothing, the prestige of working for a
multinational company. If part of the position involves
obsequious servitude to white European tourists and
providing kickbacks in the form of bottles of good
scotch to his country's military henchmen, so be it.
Cheadle's Rusesabagina may be charming and affable,
but he is also a shrewd operator who does what he
needs to in order to get by. It's tempting to make
such accidental heroes larger than life, but Cheadle
inhabits this man in such a quiet, controlled performance
that it's easy to forget you are watching a dramatic
depiction. He makes every moment of this performance
count. From his cocky musings on style at the beginning
of the film, to the obvious moments of defiance against
the military officer who can end his life at any moment,
to his silent but obvious anguish as he makes the
Hobson's choice to remain at the hotel with those
under his protection instead of accompanying his wife
and children to presumed safety, there isn't a moment
in this performance that rings false.
Cheadle's
performance is so quiet that at times he is nearly
overshadowed by the ferocity of Sophie Okenedo's portrayal
of Tatania, Rusesabagina's Tutsi wife. For a while
it seems that her role is going to be one of the conventional
damsel in distress, whose main role in the film is
to look terrified.Yet when she unleashes her fury
at what she perceives to be her husband's betrayal
of their promise to each other, Hotel Rwanda ceases
to be simply a film and becomes an almost uncomfortable
glimpse into the complexity of a marriage. Among the
excellent supporting cast, which includes Cara Seymour
as a Red Cross worker, only Nick Nolte seems largely
to have walked in from another film, and I'm not sure
which one. His Col. Kenneth Oliver seems to be on
a fairly continuous bender, and whether this is just
a function of the recent Nolte mythos or intentional
is not clear. Nolte's only convincing moment is when
he tells Paul that the UN will not intervene, and
it is a moment that will make you wince: "You're
not even n----", he says, "...you're AFRICANS."
Certainly US policy towards that continent in my lifetime
has shown this statement to be true. Genocide among
white people, such as that in the former Yugoslavia,
warrants U.S. military intervention. Yet we tend to
let dark-skinned Africans kill each other, and as
Joaquin Phoenix's journalist wryly notes in HOTEL
RWANDA, "They'll say 'Oh, isn't that horrible'...then
go back to eating their dinner'".
The dichotomy of Rwandan life
is evident in Robert Fraisse's cinematography. The
Rwandan cities and countryside are shot in the gritty,
washed-out colors we've come to expect from films
shot in developing countries, as far back as The Harder
they Come. This is contrasted with the vivid colors
used in the sequences at the Hotel Mille Collines,
where the grass is a vivid green, the water in the
pool far too blue.
Terry
George, whose last film was the Irish political drama
Some Mother's Son, has mastered the ability to portray
a huge amount of information in a single scene --
the bright, terrified eyes of a group of children
from a local orphanage shining in a darkened hotel
room. Those same children dancing around a pool as
women bail water from the pool for cooking and washing,
since the water has been turned off. George wisely
chooses not to graphically depict the horrific machete
hackings which characterized much of the Rwandan genocide.
Instead, he uses the microcosm to portray the larger
picture: the front yard of a middle-class family strewn
with their corpses. A van hobbles over an improbably
bumpy road, the bumps being more corpses. Rusesabagina
begs his wife to promise to take the children and
jump off the hotel's roof rather than be hacked to
death by machete. This film shows us the Rwandan genocide
through the eyes of the people who survived it. We
don't need to see the blood, for the director and
cast draw us into the film, and almost allow us to
experience the horror first-hand.
This
is a passionate film about an accidental hero that
never once relies on sledgehammers to prove its point.
By making the Rwandan genocide personal in telling
Rusesabagina's story, George avoids the desensitization
that occurs when a movie audience is subjected to
graphic depictions of slaughters. By revealing the
horror of the genocide through the reactions of those
who survived it, George provides a far more emotional
experience. No one who sees this film will emerge
anything other than outraged.
Hopefully this outrage will remain
with us when the Shia and Sunnis inevitably start
going at each other in Iraq once one or the other
group assumes power on January 30.
-- Jill Cozzi
|